Kaushal Kumar vs State of Bihar — 331/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),352, 351(2), 3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRJE010017162026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

1536/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

331/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

Jehanabad DJ Div

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

PALI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),352, 351(2), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kaushal Kumar

    Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

  2. 2.Mritunjay Kumar

    Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

  3. 3.Chulu Yadav

    Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

  4. 4.Nawal Yadav alias Nagal

    Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

  5. 5.Banti Kumar

    Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Court of Sessions Judge, Jehanabad granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Kaushal Kumar, Mritunjay Kumar, Chulu Yadav, Nawal Yadav, and Banti Kumar) facing charges under IPC sections related to assault and theft. The court found that the petitioners have no criminal history, the injuries were simple, and there exists a land dispute between parties suggesting the allegations may be ornamental, warranting bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 331/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Sessions Judge, Jehanabad granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Kaushal Kumar, Mritunjay Kumar, Chulu Yadav, Nawal Yadav, and Banti Kumar) facing charges under IPC sections related to assault and theft. The court found that the petitioners have no criminal history, the injuries were simple, and there exists a land dispute between parties suggesting the allegations may be ornamental, warranting bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case