Kaushal Kumar vs State of Bihar — 331/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),352, 351(2), 3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRJE010017162026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

1536/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

331/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

Jehanabad DJ Div

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

PALI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),352, 351(2), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Kaushal Kumar

Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

Mritunjay Kumar

Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

Chulu Yadav

Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

Nawal Yadav alias Nagal

Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

Banti Kumar

Adv. Harendra Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

HEARING

20-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

The Court of Sessions Judge, Jehanabad granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Kaushal Kumar, Mritunjay Kumar, Chulu Yadav, Nawal Yadav, and Banti Kumar) facing charges under IPC sections related to assault and theft. The court found that the petitioners have no criminal history, the injuries were simple, and there exists a land dispute between parties suggesting the allegations may be ornamental, warranting bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Sessions Judge, Jehanabad granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Kaushal Kumar, Mritunjay Kumar, Chulu Yadav, Nawal Yadav, and Banti Kumar) facing charges under IPC sections related to assault and theft. The court found that the petitioners have no criminal history, the injuries were simple, and there exists a land dispute between parties suggesting the allegations may be ornamental, warranting bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Jehanabad DJ Div All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case