Ankit Kumar vs State of Bihar — 291/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),191(3),324(4),352,351(2),(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRJE010015082026
Filing Number
1346/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
291/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
Jehanabad DJ Div
Judge
4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 18-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
470
Police Station
KAKO
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ankit Kumar
Adv. Kameshwar Prasad
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge II, Jehanabad rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Ankit Kumar, who faced charges of firing six bullets at a house during an armed mob attack on December 11, 2025. The court found direct allegations of firing against the petitioner and noted his prior criminal antecedent, which outweighed the defense's arguments of innocence and lack of recovered incriminating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 291/2026
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge II, Jehanabad rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Ankit Kumar, who faced charges of firing six bullets at a house during an armed mob attack on December 11, 2025. The court found direct allegations of firing against the petitioner and noted his prior criminal antecedent, which outweighed the defense's arguments of innocence and lack of recovered incriminating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts