Suday Yadav alias Suday Kumar vs State of Bihar — 290/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(3),61(2),238,140(1),103(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRJE010015072026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1345/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

290/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

Jehanabad DJ Div

Judge

3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

337

Police Station

JEHANABAD

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(3),61(2),238,140(1),103(1)

Petitioner(s)

Suday Yadav alias Suday Kumar

Adv. Sanjay Kumar Chaoudhary

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

19-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

17-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Order

Summary: The court rejected the accused Suday Yadav Urf Suday Kumar's bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 61(2), 140(1), 103(1), and 238, relating to kidnapping and murder. The court found credible evidence of the accused's involvement, including that Rs. 50,000 was transferred through co-accused Ravi Ratan to the accused on the same day as the alleged crime, suggesting complicity in the offense. Given the serious nature of the charges and prima facie evidence of guilt, the court deemed bail inappropriate and dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the accused Suday Yadav Urf Suday Kumar's bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 61(2), 140(1), 103(1), and 238, relating to kidnapping and murder. The court found credible evidence of the accused's involvement, including that Rs. 50,000 was transferred through co-accused Ravi Ratan to the accused on the same day as the alleged crime, suggesting complicity in the offense. Given the serious nature of the charges and prima facie evidence of guilt, the court deemed bail inappropriate and dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Jehanabad DJ Div All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case