Uday Kumar vs State of Bihar — 280/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,303(2),351(2),352,109(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRJE010014142026

Filing Number

1261/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

280/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Jehanabad DJ Div

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

PALI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,303(2),351(2),352,109(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Uday Kumar

    Adv. Om Prakash Singh

  2. 2.Arun Kumar

  3. 3.Mallu Kumar

  4. 4.Yogendra Kumar alias Jogindar Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Jehanabad granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Uday Kumar, Arun Kumar, Mallu Kumar, and Yogendra Kumar) in a case involving allegations of assault and wrongful restraint during a land dispute. The court found that the injuries were simple, the accused had no criminal antecedents, and the case involved a civil land dispute between Gotiya parties, justifying bail on bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 280/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Jehanabad granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Uday Kumar, Arun Kumar, Mallu Kumar, and Yogendra Kumar) in a case involving allegations of assault and wrongful restraint during a land dispute. The court found that the injuries were simple, the accused had no criminal antecedents, and the case involved a civil land dispute between Gotiya parties, justifying bail on bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case