Poonam Kumari vs State of Bihar — 275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),74,303(2),109,352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRJE010013922026

Filing Number

1243/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Jehanabad DJ Div

Judge

4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

265

Police Station

GHOSI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),74,303(2),109,352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Poonam Kumari

    Adv. SRI AJAY KUMAR

  2. 2.Chandan Paswan

  3. 3.Raju Paswan alias Amit Kumar

  4. 4.Prachi Kumari

  5. 5.Shivnandan Paswan

  6. 6.Pramod Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Poonam Kumari, Chandan Paswan, Raju Paswan, and Prachi Kumari) based on general and omnibus allegations against them, requiring Rs. 15,000 bail bonds with sureties each. However, the court rejected anticipatory bail for Shivnandan Paswan, finding substantial evidence of his direct involvement in assaulting women, obstructing their way while intoxicated, and attempting to kill the informant's daughter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Poonam Kumari, Chandan Paswan, Raju Paswan, and Prachi Kumari) based on general and omnibus allegations against them, requiring Rs. 15,000 bail bonds with sureties each. However, the court rejected anticipatory bail for Shivnandan Paswan, finding substantial evidence of his direct involvement in assaulting women, obstructing their way while intoxicated, and attempting to kill the informant's daughter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case