RAMKUMAR MANDAL vs STATE OF BIHAR — 1811/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,498A. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010069562025
Filing Number
6333/2025
Filing Date
02-Dec-2025
Registration No
1811/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
8-District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1293
Police Station
COMPLAINT CASE
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMKUMAR MANDAL
Adv. RAJ KUMAR THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary The District and Sessions Court, Jamui granted bail to Ram Kumar Mandal in a dowry harassment case (CrPC Sections 383, 498, 494, and Dowry Prohibition Act) after the petitioner submitted an undertaking reconciling with his wife. The court found the allegations unsubstantiated and ordered bail on condition that the petitioner take his wife and children home, provide financial support, and maintain dignified treatment, with a bond of ₹10,000 and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
05-Jan-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
05-Dec-2025
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1811/2025
Summary The District and Sessions Court, Jamui granted bail to Ram Kumar Mandal in a dowry harassment case (CrPC Sections 383, 498, 494, and Dowry Prohibition Act) after the petitioner submitted an undertaking reconciling with his wife. The court found the allegations unsubstantiated and ordered bail on condition that the petitioner take his wife and children home, provide financial support, and maintain dignified treatment, with a bond of ₹10,000 and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts