STATE OF BIHAR vs SINGHO YADAV AND 4 OTHERS — 489/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRJA010066262024

Filing Number

6597/2024

Filing Date

20-Nov-2024

Registration No

489/2024

Registration Date

20-Nov-2024

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

124

Police Station

CHANDRADEEP

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,504,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SINGHO YADAV AND 4 OTHERS

  2. 2.BALEY YADAV

  3. 3.AKHILESH YADAV

  4. 4.RAJENDRA YADAV

  5. 5.CHANDRESHWAR YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court in Jamui acquitted all five accused (Singho Yadav, Bale Yadav, Rajendra Yadav, Chandreshwar Yadav, and Akhilesh Yadav) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, and Section 34. The court found that the prosecution witness (case informant Pappu Yadav) could not provide reliable evidence about the alleged assault incident from November 6, 2018, testifying there was a crowd and he could not identify the attackers, while other prosecution witnesses claimed no knowledge of the incident. Finding insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt, the court discharged the accused and released their sureties from bond liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  12. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  13. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  14. 28-May-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  15. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  16. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  17. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  18. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  19. 29-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 20-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 489/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court in Jamui acquitted all five accused (Singho Yadav, Bale Yadav, Rajendra Yadav, Chandreshwar Yadav, and Akhilesh Yadav) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, and Section 34. The court found that the prosecution witness (case informant Pappu Yadav) could not provide reliable evidence about the alleged assault incident from November 6, 2018, testifying there was a crowd and he could not identify the attackers, while other prosecution witnesses claimed no knowledge of the incident. Finding insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt, the court discharged the accused and released their sureties from bond liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case