SHOBHA DEVI vs KUSHAL YADAV — 85/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,448,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

SPL CASE (SC/ST) - SPL CASE(SC/ST)

CNR: BRJA010062772024

Filing Number

6276/2024

Filing Date

30-Sep-2024

Registration No

85/2024

Registration Date

30-Sep-2024

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

JAMUI SC/ST

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,448,504,506,34
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHOBHA DEVI

    Adv. SPL.PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUSHAL YADAV

  2. 2.KUMAR YADAV

  3. 3.GUTTRU YADAV

  4. 4.TRIVENI YADAV

  5. 5.FALKU YADAV

  6. 6.LATTU YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 85/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused (Triveni Yadav, Gannu Yadav, Laldu Yadav, Palku Yadav, Kushal Yadav, and Kumar Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 448, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(i)(r), 3(i)(s), 3(2)(va), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case relied primarily on the complainant's (Shobha Devi's) testimony, who testified to an alleged assault on 07-10-2023. However, the second prosecution witness was declared hostile by the prosecution itself, and the complainant's own cross-examination revealed she filed the FIR in error and only put her signature on a blank paper, casting serious doubt on her credibility and the reliability of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  10. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  11. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    Appearance.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  13. 03-Jul-2025

    Appearance.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  14. 03-May-2025

    Appearance.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  15. 27-Feb-2025

    Appearance.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  16. 07-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 30-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 85/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused (Triveni Yadav, Gannu Yadav, Laldu Yadav, Palku Yadav, Kushal Yadav, and Kumar Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 448, 504, 506 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(i)(r), 3(i)(s), 3(2)(va), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case relied primarily on the complainant's (Shobha Devi's) testimony, who testified to an alleged assault on 07-10-2023. However, the second prosecution witness was declared hostile by the prosecution itself, and the complainant's own cross-examination revealed she filed the FIR in error and only put her signature on a blank paper, casting serious doubt on her credibility and the reliability of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case