JAMUI PS-426/18 NUTAN DEVI vs RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA — 7/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366A. Disposed: Uncontested--232 CRPC on 09th March 2026.
CHILDREN ACT CASE
CNR: BRJA010057162019
Filing Number
7/2019
Filing Date
31-Jul-2019
Registration No
7/2019
Registration Date
31-Jul-2019
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--232 CRPC
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
426
Police Station
JAMUI
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAMUI PS-426/18 NUTAN DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui acquitted accused Rakesh Kumar under Section 232 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to lack of prosecution evidence. Despite multiple notices and summons, no prosecution witnesses appeared to testify during trial, rendering it impossible to prove the charges under IPC Sections 366A/34 and 376(2)(g) and POSCO Act Section 4. The accused and his sureties were consequently discharged from all liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
24-Feb-2026
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
20-Feb-2026
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
31-Jan-2026
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
27-Jan-2026
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
12-Dec-2025
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
28-Nov-2025
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
29-Oct-2025
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
23-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jul-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2019
The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui acquitted accused Rakesh Kumar under Section 232 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to lack of prosecution evidence. Despite multiple notices and summons, no prosecution witnesses appeared to testify during trial, rendering it impossible to prove the charges under IPC Sections 366A/34 and 376(2)(g) and POSCO Act Section 4. The accused and his sureties were consequently discharged from all liabilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts