SANJAY YADAV AND ONE OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 1477/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,76,79,308(3),308(4),303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010053152025

Case disposed

Filing Number

4819/2025

Filing Date

15-09-2025

Registration No

1477/2025

Registration Date

15-09-2025

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

119

Police Station

GARHI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,76,79,308(3),308(4),303(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

SANJAY YADAV AND ONE OTHER

Adv. RAMJIVAN KANOUJIA

SARITA DEVI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

10-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

HEARING.

24-03-2026

HEARING.

12-03-2026

HEARING.

27-02-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Bail Order

Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Sanjay Yadav and Sarita Devi in a case involving charges of extortion, criminal intimidation, and assault under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 79, 308(3), 308(4), 303(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found that while serious allegations existed (including allegedly hitting the complainant with a pistol butt), the injuries were medically assessed as simple in nature, police failed to provide statutory notice, and applying precedents from Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, the petitioners merited bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Sanjay Yadav and Sarita Devi in a case involving charges of extortion, criminal intimidation, and assault under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 79, 308(3), 308(4), 303(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found that while serious allegations existed (including allegedly hitting the complainant with a pistol butt), the injuries were medically assessed as simple in nature, police failed to provide statutory notice, and applying precedents from Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, the petitioners merited bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case