SANJAY YADAV AND ONE OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 1477/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,76,79,308(3),308(4),303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010053152025

Filing Number

4819/2025

Filing Date

15-Sep-2025

Registration No

1477/2025

Registration Date

15-Sep-2025

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

119

Police Station

GARHI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,76,79,308(3),308(4),303(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY YADAV AND ONE OTHER

    Adv. RAMJIVAN KANOUJIA

  2. 2.SARITA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Sanjay Yadav and Sarita Devi in a case involving charges of extortion, criminal intimidation, and assault under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 79, 308(3), 308(4), 303(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found that while serious allegations existed (including allegedly hitting the complainant with a pistol butt), the injuries were medically assessed as simple in nature, police failed to provide statutory notice, and applying precedents from Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, the petitioners merited bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  13. 24-Dec-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  15. 08-Dec-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  16. 27-Nov-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  17. 18-Nov-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  18. 07-Nov-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  19. 31-Oct-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  20. 14-Oct-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  21. 26-Sep-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  22. 18-Sep-2025

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  23. 17-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 15-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1477/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Sanjay Yadav and Sarita Devi in a case involving charges of extortion, criminal intimidation, and assault under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 79, 308(3), 308(4), 303(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found that while serious allegations existed (including allegedly hitting the complainant with a pistol butt), the injuries were medically assessed as simple in nature, police failed to provide statutory notice, and applying precedents from Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, the petitioners merited bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case