STATE OF BIHAR vs BUDHAK YADAV @ CHHOTU @SHARAD YADAV — 274/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,376,511,379,302,120B,. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRJA010043982021
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
274/2021
Filing Date
01-10-2021
Registration No
274/2021
Registration Date
01-10-2021
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
FIR Details
FIR Number
467
Police Station
KHAIRA
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
BUDHAK YADAV @ CHHOTU @SHARAD YADAV
SUNIL YADAV
KEDAR YADAV
PRAMOD YADAV
BIRENDRA YADAV @ BRITISH YADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 22-11-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 26-09-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 05-08-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the regular bail application of Sunil Yadav (petitioner) in Sessions Trial Case No. 274/2021 under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 376, 511, 379, 302, 120B and Arms Act section 27. The court found that the petitioner deliberately misused bail privileges by absconding for ten months after witness examination on 28.11.2022 without appearing in court, and his counsel failed to cross-examine witnesses despite filing petition under Cr.P.C. section 317. The court also noted that the petitioner violated bail conditions and engaged in similar criminal activities (armed intimidation of witnesses), thereby rendering him ineligible for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the regular bail application of Sunil Yadav (petitioner) in Sessions Trial Case No. 274/2021 under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 376, 511, 379, 302, 120B and Arms Act section 27. The court found that the petitioner deliberately misused bail privileges by absconding for ten months after witness examination on 28.11.2022 without appearing in court, and his counsel failed to cross-examine witnesses despite filing petition under Cr.P.C. section 317. The court also noted that the petitioner violated bail conditions and engaged in similar criminal activities (armed intimidation of witnesses), thereby rendering him ineligible for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts