MINAVA DEVI vs RAJESH YADAV AND 2 OTHERS — 61/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),76,352,3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

COMPLAINT CASE (DJ DIV)

CNR: BRJA010042852025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3864/2025

Filing Date

30-07-2025

Registration No

61/2025

Registration Date

30-07-2025

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),76,352,3(5)
SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va),3(I)(h)

Petitioner(s)

MINAVA DEVI

Adv. SATISH PRASAD

Respondent(s)

RAJESH YADAV AND 2 OTHERS

SHIV YADAV

BISHANU YADAV

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

16-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

Soleman Affirmation (S.A)

09-02-2026

Soleman Affirmation (S.A)

07-02-2026

Soleman Affirmation (S.A)

27-01-2026

Soleman Affirmation (S.A)

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 61C/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Minwa Devi's petition challenging the police's final report (FIR No. 21/2024) that found the charges baseless. The court found the petitioner's evidence insufficient and unreliable, concluding there was no credible testimony to establish that the accused committed any offense. Therefore, the petition was dismissed. Key Reasoning: The court noted significant inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony—crucial details like alleged physical assault and immersion in dirty water were absent from both the petitioner's sworn statement and witness accounts. The two examining witnesses provided contradictory statements and failed to corroborate key allegations. The court determined there was insufficient reliable evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 61C/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Minwa Devi's petition challenging the police's final report (FIR No. 21/2024) that found the charges baseless. The court found the petitioner's evidence insufficient and unreliable, concluding there was no credible testimony to establish that the accused committed any offense. Therefore, the petition was dismissed. Key Reasoning: The court noted significant inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony—crucial details like alleged physical assault and immersion in dirty water were absent from both the petitioner's sworn statement and witness accounts. The two examining witnesses provided contradictory statements and failed to corroborate key allegations. The court determined there was insufficient reliable evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case