MINAVA DEVI vs RAJESH YADAV AND 2 OTHERS — 61/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),76,352,3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.
COMPLAINT CASE (DJ DIV)
CNR: BRJA010042852025
Filing Number
3864/2025
Filing Date
30-07-2025
Registration No
61/2025
Registration Date
30-07-2025
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MINAVA DEVI
Adv. SATISH PRASAD
Respondent(s)
RAJESH YADAV AND 2 OTHERS
SHIV YADAV
BISHANU YADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
Disposed
Soleman Affirmation (S.A)
Soleman Affirmation (S.A)
Soleman Affirmation (S.A)
Soleman Affirmation (S.A)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Soleman Affirmation (S.A) |
| 09-02-2026 | Soleman Affirmation (S.A) |
| 07-02-2026 | Soleman Affirmation (S.A) |
| 27-01-2026 | Soleman Affirmation (S.A) |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 61C/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Minwa Devi's petition challenging the police's final report (FIR No. 21/2024) that found the charges baseless. The court found the petitioner's evidence insufficient and unreliable, concluding there was no credible testimony to establish that the accused committed any offense. Therefore, the petition was dismissed. Key Reasoning: The court noted significant inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony—crucial details like alleged physical assault and immersion in dirty water were absent from both the petitioner's sworn statement and witness accounts. The two examining witnesses provided contradictory statements and failed to corroborate key allegations. The court determined there was insufficient reliable evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 61C/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Minwa Devi's petition challenging the police's final report (FIR No. 21/2024) that found the charges baseless. The court found the petitioner's evidence insufficient and unreliable, concluding there was no credible testimony to establish that the accused committed any offense. Therefore, the petition was dismissed. Key Reasoning: The court noted significant inconsistencies in the petitioner's testimony—crucial details like alleged physical assault and immersion in dirty water were absent from both the petitioner's sworn statement and witness accounts. The two examining witnesses provided contradictory statements and failed to corroborate key allegations. The court determined there was insufficient reliable evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts