JAMUI SC/ST-09/25- CHANDAN DAS vs RAJ KUMAR ALIYAS ROCKY RAWAT — 83/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),351(2),352,74. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

SPL CASE (SC/ST) - SPL CASE(SC/ST)

CNR: BRJA010036302025

Filing Number

3279/2025

Filing Date

01-Jul-2025

Registration No

83/2025

Registration Date

01-Jul-2025

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

09

Police Station

JAMUI SC/ST

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),351(2),352,74
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(1)(w),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAMUI SC/ST-09/25- CHANDAN DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR ALIYAS ROCKY RAWAT

  2. 2.SAGAR KUMAR ALIYAS SAGAR RAWAT

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  3. 12-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: SC/ST Case No. 83/2025 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge (SC/ST Act), Jamui acquitted both accused—Sagar Kumar (alias Sagar Rawat) and Raj Kumar (alias Rocky Rawat)—of all charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 351(2), 352 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 sections 3(i)(r), 3(i)(s), 3(i)(w), 3(2)(va). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Prosecution witness (informant) Chandan Das admitted during cross-examination that the case was filed due to misunderstanding, and witness Mamta Kumari testified that no assault occurred against her or her husband. The court found insufficient credible evidence to sustain the charges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-May-2026

    Argument

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  5. 11-May-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  11. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  13. 31-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 01-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 83/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC/ST Case No. 83/2025 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge (SC/ST Act), Jamui acquitted both accused—Sagar Kumar (alias Sagar Rawat) and Raj Kumar (alias Rocky Rawat)—of all charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 351(2), 352 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 sections 3(i)(r), 3(i)(s), 3(i)(w), 3(2)(va). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Prosecution witness (informant) Chandan Das admitted during cross-examination that the case was filed due to misunderstanding, and witness Mamta Kumari testified that no assault occurred against her or her husband. The court found insufficient credible evidence to sustain the charges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case