GUDIYA KUMARI vs STATE OF BIHAR AND 11 OTHERS — 73/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
CRIMINAL REVISION
CNR: BRJA010034842025
Filing Number
3145/2025
Filing Date
26-06-2025
Registration No
73/2025
Registration Date
26-06-2025
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
537
Police Station
COMPLAINT CASE
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GUDIYA KUMARI
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR AND 11 OTHERS
SURAJ KUMAR VISHWAKARMA
PRADEEP VISHWAKARMA
SANJAY VISHWAKARMA
SANJU DEVI
WIFE OF LADDU GOPAL VISHWAKARMA
LADDU GOPQL VISHWAKARMA
NAVIN KUMAR VISHWAKARMA
PRAVEEN KUMAR VISHWAKARMA
ARIND KUMAR VISHWAKARMA
MAMTA DEVI
KHUSHBU KUMARI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING.
REJOINDER
REJOINDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 09-04-2026 | HEARING. |
| 16-03-2026 | REJOINDER |
| 02-03-2026 | REJOINDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Jamui allowed Gudiya Kumari's revision petition against the lower court's cognizance order, finding that the magistrate improperly ignored allegations of dowry-related cruelty despite prima facie evidence from four inquiry witnesses. The court set aside the order to the extent cognizance was not taken under IPC Section 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3/4, remitting the matter for fresh consideration of these offences based on available materials in the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Jamui allowed Gudiya Kumari's revision petition against the lower court's cognizance order, finding that the magistrate improperly ignored allegations of dowry-related cruelty despite prima facie evidence from four inquiry witnesses. The court set aside the order to the extent cognizance was not taken under IPC Section 498A and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3/4, remitting the matter for fresh consideration of these offences based on available materials in the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts