MUNIYA D EVI vs SAHDEO YADAV AND NINE OTHERS — 36/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),126(2),76,329(1),352,3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.

COMPLAINT CASE (DJ DIV)

CNR: BRJA010027062025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2450/2025

Filing Date

24-05-2025

Registration No

36/2025

Registration Date

24-05-2025

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),126(2),76,329(1),352,3(5)
SC/ST Act Section 3(iii) 3(v) 3(x) 3(xi)

Petitioner(s)

MUNIYA D EVI

Adv. JITENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

SAHDEO YADAV AND NINE OTHERS

MANAKWA DEVI

SHANKAR YADAV

MUNNI DEVI

SANJEEV YADAV

PRIYANKA DEVI

RANJEET YADAV

SHAMBHU YADAV

NITISH YADAV

BABITA DEVI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Soleman Affirmation (S.A)

09-03-2026

Soleman Affirmation (S.A)

18-02-2026

Soleman Affirmation (S.A)

02-02-2026

Soleman Affirmation (S.A)

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui rejected the criminal appeal filed by Muniya Devi against Sahdeo Yadav and others, finding insufficient and unreliable evidence to establish a prima facie case of crime. The court noted contradictions between the plaintiff's statement, her witnesses' testimonies, and the complaint petition, particularly regarding whether her son was also assaulted, making the case lack credible corroboration necessary for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui rejected the criminal appeal filed by Muniya Devi against Sahdeo Yadav and others, finding insufficient and unreliable evidence to establish a prima facie case of crime. The court noted contradictions between the plaintiff's statement, her witnesses' testimonies, and the complaint petition, particularly regarding whether her son was also assaulted, making the case lack credible corroboration necessary for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case