MUNIYA D EVI vs SAHDEO YADAV AND NINE OTHERS — 36/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),126(2),76,329(1),352,3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

COMPLAINT CASE (DJ DIV)

CNR: BRJA010027062025

Filing Number

2450/2025

Filing Date

24-May-2025

Registration No

36/2025

Registration Date

24-May-2025

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),126(2),76,329(1),352,3(5)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(iii) 3(v) 3(x) 3(xi)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNIYA D EVI

    Adv. JITENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAHDEO YADAV AND NINE OTHERS

  2. 2.MANAKWA DEVI

  3. 3.SHANKAR YADAV

  4. 4.MUNNI DEVI

  5. 5.SANJEEV YADAV

  6. 6.PRIYANKA DEVI

  7. 7.RANJEET YADAV

  8. 8.SHAMBHU YADAV

  9. 9.NITISH YADAV

  10. 10.BABITA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui rejected the criminal appeal filed by Muniya Devi against Sahdeo Yadav and others, finding insufficient and unreliable evidence to establish a prima facie case of crime. The court noted contradictions between the plaintiff's statement, her witnesses' testimonies, and the complaint petition, particularly regarding whether her son was also assaulted, making the case lack credible corroboration necessary for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  12. 04-Nov-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  15. 01-Sep-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  17. 30-Jul-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  18. 29-Jul-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  19. 14-Jul-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  20. 23-Jun-2025

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  21. 02-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 24-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui rejected the criminal appeal filed by Muniya Devi against Sahdeo Yadav and others, finding insufficient and unreliable evidence to establish a prima facie case of crime. The court noted contradictions between the plaintiff's statement, her witnesses' testimonies, and the complaint petition, particularly regarding whether her son was also assaulted, making the case lack credible corroboration necessary for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case