STATE OF BIHAR vs GAURI SAH AND 4 OTHERS — 185/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,325,307,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRJA010025912025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2346/2025
Filing Date
17-05-2025
Registration No
185/2025
Registration Date
17-05-2025
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
KHAIRA
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Respondent(s)
GAURI SAH AND 4 OTHERS
KRISHNA MURARI SAH
RABINDRA SAH
VINDU SAH
DHARMENDRA SAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENT
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENT | |
| 27-02-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE | |
| 18-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Jamui acquitted all five accused persons (Gauri Sah, Murari Sah, Bindu Sah, Dharmendra Sah, and Rabindra Sah) of charges under IPC Sections 341/34, 323/34, 324/34, 325/34, 307/34, and 504/34. The court found that the prosecution miserably failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the four eye witnesses contradicted their initial claims by testifying during cross-examination that they fell down due to stampede rather than being assaulted by the accused, and the fifth witness turned hostile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Jamui acquitted all five accused persons (Gauri Sah, Murari Sah, Bindu Sah, Dharmendra Sah, and Rabindra Sah) of charges under IPC Sections 341/34, 323/34, 324/34, 325/34, 307/34, and 504/34. The court found that the prosecution miserably failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the four eye witnesses contradicted their initial claims by testifying during cross-examination that they fell down due to stampede rather than being assaulted by the accused, and the fifth witness turned hostile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts