devendra paswan vs mahendra kumar — 33/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,379,504,34. Disposed: Uncontested--232 CRPC on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

SPL CASE (SC/ST) - SPL CASE(SC/ST)

CNR: BRJA010025742018

Filing Number

33/2018

Filing Date

29-Mar-2013

Registration No

33/2018

Registration Date

25-Apr-2018

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--232 CRPC

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

CHANDRADEEP

Year

2103

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,379,504,34
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1),10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.devendra paswan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.mahendra kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui acquitted Arun Yadav and others under Section 232 of the CrPC, finding insufficient evidence to prove charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, 379, 504 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(x). The sole prosecution witness (informant Devendra Paswan) contradicted the prosecution case by testifying the matter involved a neighborly dispute from 2013 that was amicably settled, and both parties filed a joint compromise petition which the court accepted, leading to acquittal and release of the accused and their sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  8. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  9. 07-May-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  10. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  11. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  12. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  13. 23-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  14. 14-May-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  15. 23-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  16. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  17. 03-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  18. 23-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  19. 26-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  20. 26-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  21. 13-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  22. 14-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  23. 17-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  24. 08-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  25. 09-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  26. 16-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  27. 24-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  28. 15-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  29. 26-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  30. 14-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  31. 23-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  32. 04-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  33. 12-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  34. 19-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  35. 19-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  36. 06-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  37. 06-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  38. 15-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  39. 18-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  40. 22-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  41. 14-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  42. 29-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  43. 15-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  44. 26-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  45. 18-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  46. 07-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  47. 29-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  48. 05-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  49. 19-Jan-2019

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  50. 28-Nov-2018

    Evidence

    District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

  51. 27-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 29-Mar-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui acquitted Arun Yadav and others under Section 232 of the CrPC, finding insufficient evidence to prove charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, 379, 504 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(x). The sole prosecution witness (informant Devendra Paswan) contradicted the prosecution case by testifying the matter involved a neighborly dispute from 2013 that was amicably settled, and both parties filed a joint compromise petition which the court accepted, leading to acquittal and release of the accused and their sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case