sangita hansda vs Jatal Yadav and two others — 54/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd May 2026.
SPL CASE (SC/ST) - SPL CASE(SC/ST)
CNR: BRJA010022712018
Filing Number
54/2018
Filing Date
26-May-2018
Registration No
54/2018
Registration Date
14-Aug-2018
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
Decision Date
23-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
JAMUI SC/ST
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.sangita hansda
Adv. CHANDAN KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jatal Yadav and two others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-May-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary of SC/ST Case No. 54/2018 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all three accused (Tribhuwan Yadav, Jatal Yadav, and Pawarit Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 504 and SC/ST Act 1989 section 3(i)(r)(s). The court found the prosecution case to be evidence-deficient, as only one witness testified during trial and remained absent for cross-examination, rendering the testimony insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-May-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
22-May-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
20-May-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
18-May-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
05-May-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
23-Apr-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
10-Apr-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
16-Mar-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
18-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
21-May-2025
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
18-Dec-2024
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
05-Oct-2024
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
15-Apr-2024
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
31-Jan-2024
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
28-Nov-2023
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
05-Sep-2023
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
12-Jul-2023
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
11-May-2023
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
02-Mar-2023
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
13-Jan-2023
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
21-Nov-2022
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
08-Sep-2022
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
02-Jul-2022
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
09-May-2022
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
21-Mar-2022
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
02-Feb-2022
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
15-Dec-2021
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
04-Oct-2021
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
09-Aug-2021
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
21-Jun-2021
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
29-Apr-2021
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
08-Mar-2021
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
13-Jan-2021
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
09-Nov-2020
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
27-Aug-2020
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
02-Jul-2020
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
05-May-2020
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
16-Mar-2020
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
05-Feb-2020
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
21-Dec-2019
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
20-Nov-2019
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
24-Sep-2019
Appearance.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
19-Sep-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
18-Sep-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
05-Aug-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
27-Jul-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
25-Jun-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
07-Jun-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
29-Apr-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
25-Mar-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
12-Feb-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
07-Jan-2019
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
14-Dec-2018
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
02-Nov-2018
Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
28-Sep-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2018
Summary of SC/ST Case No. 54/2018 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all three accused (Tribhuwan Yadav, Jatal Yadav, and Pawarit Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 504 and SC/ST Act 1989 section 3(i)(r)(s). The court found the prosecution case to be evidence-deficient, as only one witness testified during trial and remained absent for cross-examination, rendering the testimony insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts