MAMTA KUMARI vs JITENDRA KUMAR — 70/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
MAINTENANCE
CNR: BRJA010022502025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
204/2025
Filing Date
03-05-2025
Registration No
70/2025
Registration Date
03-05-2025
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
5-Family Court, Jamui
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAMTA KUMARI
Adv. MUKESH KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
JITENDRA KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Family Court, Jamui
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
APPEARANCE.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-02-2026 | Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner | |
| 21-01-2026 | Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner | |
| 06-01-2026 | APPEARANCE. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Family Court of Jamui ordered the husband Jitendra Kumar to pay monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 to his wife Mamta Kumari from the date of petition filing, along with ₹5,000 as litigation expenses and arrears to be cleared within three months in equal installments. The court found the petitioner to be a legally wedded wife entitled to maintenance, having proved her husband's neglect, cruelty (including dowry harassment and physical assault), and his earning capacity as an unskilled laborer, despite her requesting ₹20,000 monthly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Family Court of Jamui ordered the husband Jitendra Kumar to pay monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 to his wife Mamta Kumari from the date of petition filing, along with ₹5,000 as litigation expenses and arrears to be cleared within three months in equal installments. The court found the petitioner to be a legally wedded wife entitled to maintenance, having proved her husband's neglect, cruelty (including dowry harassment and physical assault), and his earning capacity as an unskilled laborer, despite her requesting ₹20,000 monthly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts