VIJAY DAS AND TWO OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR — 354/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,379,354,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010017212026
e-Filing Number
18-03-2026
Filing Number
1584/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
354/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1282
Police Station
COMPLAINT CASE
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY DAS AND TWO OTHERS
Adv. Anup Kumar Singh
-
2.ARUN KUMAR
Adv. Anup Kumar Singh
-
3.SITARAM DAS
Adv. Anup Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Vijay Das & Others vs. State of Bihar (354/2026) The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui granted bail to the three accused (Vijay Das, Arun Kumar, and Sitaram Das) in a complaint case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, 379, 354, and 504. The court found that both parties had reached a settlement regarding the underlying dispute over water, and the accused had no prior criminal history. The court imposed the condition that the accused furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 354/2026
Case Summary: Vijay Das & Others vs. State of Bihar (354/2026) The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui granted bail to the three accused (Vijay Das, Arun Kumar, and Sitaram Das) in a complaint case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, 379, 354, and 504. The court found that both parties had reached a settlement regarding the underlying dispute over water, and the accused had no prior criminal history. The court imposed the condition that the accused furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts