BAIJU YADAV AND ONE OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 171/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,307,379,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
REGULAR BAIL
CNR: BRJA010015842026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
1457/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
171/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
23-District And Additional Sessions Judge VIII Jamui
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
440
Police Station
KHAIRA
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BAIJU YADAV AND ONE OTHER
Adv. Chanchal Kumar Dubey
-
2.CHANO YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Case 171/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Court, Jamui granted bail to accused Baiju Yadav and Chano Yadav in a case involving alleged assault and robbery. The court found that while specific allegations of assault existed, the informant's injuries were simple in nature and the accused had been in custody for over one month, warranting bail. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on cooperation in investigation and non-interference with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge VIII Jamui
-
25-Mar-2026
Order
District And Additional Sessions Judge VIII Jamui
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge VIII Jamui
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge VIII Jamui
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 171/2026
Case 171/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Court, Jamui granted bail to accused Baiju Yadav and Chano Yadav in a case involving alleged assault and robbery. The court found that while specific allegations of assault existed, the informant's injuries were simple in nature and the accused had been in custody for over one month, warranting bail. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on cooperation in investigation and non-interference with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts