DIMPLE KUMAR ALIAS DIMPLE MANDAL vs STATE OF BIHAR — 333/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010015792026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
1452/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
333/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
660
Police Station
JAMUI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIMPLE KUMAR ALIAS DIMPLE MANDAL
Adv. RAJEEV RANJAN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Dimpal Kumar v. State of Bihar (333/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to Dimpal Kumar, accused of cattle theft under BNS sections 303(2), 351(2), and 3(5) in connection with the theft of two buffaloes on 05.12.2025. The court found that although the prosecution established a prima facie case with witness corroboration, the petitioner's case was on similar footing to co-accused already granted bail, he had not been given mandatory notice under section 35(3) BNSS, and nothing was recovered from his possession. The petitioner was released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Dimpal Kumar v. State of Bihar (333/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to Dimpal Kumar, accused of cattle theft under BNS sections 303(2), 351(2), and 3(5) in connection with the theft of two buffaloes on 05.12.2025. The court found that although the prosecution established a prima facie case with witness corroboration, the petitioner's case was on similar footing to co-accused already granted bail, he had not been given mandatory notice under section 35(3) BNSS, and nothing was recovered from his possession. The petitioner was released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts