DIMPLE KUMAR ALIAS DIMPLE MANDAL vs STATE OF BIHAR — 333/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010015792026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

1452/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

333/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

660

Police Station

JAMUI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

DIMPLE KUMAR ALIAS DIMPLE MANDAL

Adv. RAJEEV RANJAN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

01-04-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

HEARING.

17-03-2026

HEARING.

16-03-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Bail Order

Case Summary: Dimpal Kumar v. State of Bihar (333/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to Dimpal Kumar, accused of cattle theft under BNS sections 303(2), 351(2), and 3(5) in connection with the theft of two buffaloes on 05.12.2025. The court found that although the prosecution established a prima facie case with witness corroboration, the petitioner's case was on similar footing to co-accused already granted bail, he had not been given mandatory notice under section 35(3) BNSS, and nothing was recovered from his possession. The petitioner was released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Dimpal Kumar v. State of Bihar (333/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to Dimpal Kumar, accused of cattle theft under BNS sections 303(2), 351(2), and 3(5) in connection with the theft of two buffaloes on 05.12.2025. The court found that although the prosecution established a prima facie case with witness corroboration, the petitioner's case was on similar footing to co-accused already granted bail, he had not been given mandatory notice under section 35(3) BNSS, and nothing was recovered from his possession. The petitioner was released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case