RESHMA KHATOON AND ONE OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 329/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010015692026

Filing Number

1446/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

329/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1112

Police Station

COMPLAINT CASE

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498(A)
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RESHMA KHATOON AND ONE OTHER

    Adv. BINAY KUMAR YADAV

  2. 2.MD SAHIL ANSARI ALIAS SAHIL ANSARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Reshma Khatoon and Md. Sahil Ansari (father-in-law and mother-in-law) in a dowry harassment case (Case No. 1112C/2020 under IPC §498A and Dowry Prohibition Act §3/4). The court found that since the offences carry less than 7 years imprisonment, the petitioners deserved pre-arrest bail protection per Supreme Court precedent, and ordered their release on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 329/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Reshma Khatoon and Md. Sahil Ansari (father-in-law and mother-in-law) in a dowry harassment case (Case No. 1112C/2020 under IPC §498A and Dowry Prohibition Act §3/4). The court found that since the offences carry less than 7 years imprisonment, the petitioners deserved pre-arrest bail protection per Supreme Court precedent, and ordered their release on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case