SUNIL KUMAR AND ONE OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 170/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(5),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
REGULAR BAIL
CNR: BRJA010015682026
Filing Number
1445/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
170/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
20-District And Additional Sessions Judge VI, Jamui
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
69
Police Station
KHAIRA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL KUMAR AND ONE OTHER
Adv. RAJ KUMAR YADAV
-
2.MANNU KUMAR ALIAS MONU KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Case 170/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Jamui granted regular bail to Sunil Kumar and Mannu Kumar @ Monu Kumar, who were arrested for allegedly riding a stolen motorcycle. The court allowed the bail petition based on the petitioners' clean criminal antecedent, extended custody period (since 26.02.2026), and the fact that police failed to identify the true owner of the motorcycle, taking a lenient approach. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equivalent amount, with the condition that one surety must be a parent and the other a public servant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge VI, Jamui
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge VI, Jamui
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing.
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge VI, Jamui
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 170/2026
Case 170/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Jamui granted regular bail to Sunil Kumar and Mannu Kumar @ Monu Kumar, who were arrested for allegedly riding a stolen motorcycle. The court allowed the bail petition based on the petitioners' clean criminal antecedent, extended custody period (since 26.02.2026), and the fact that police failed to identify the true owner of the motorcycle, taking a lenient approach. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equivalent amount, with the condition that one surety must be a parent and the other a public servant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts