SUNIL KUMAR AND ONE OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 170/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(5),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

REGULAR BAIL

CNR: BRJA010015682026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1445/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

170/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

20-District And Additional Sessions Judge VI, Jamui

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

KHAIRA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(5),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

SUNIL KUMAR AND ONE OTHER

Adv. RAJ KUMAR YADAV

MANNU KUMAR ALIAS MONU KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 20-District And Additional Sessions Judge VI, Jamui

07-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

HEARING.

28-03-2026

HEARING.

17-03-2026

HEARING.

16-03-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Bail Order

Case 170/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Jamui granted regular bail to Sunil Kumar and Mannu Kumar @ Monu Kumar, who were arrested for allegedly riding a stolen motorcycle. The court allowed the bail petition based on the petitioners' clean criminal antecedent, extended custody period (since 26.02.2026), and the fact that police failed to identify the true owner of the motorcycle, taking a lenient approach. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equivalent amount, with the condition that one surety must be a parent and the other a public servant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 170/2026 Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Jamui granted regular bail to Sunil Kumar and Mannu Kumar @ Monu Kumar, who were arrested for allegedly riding a stolen motorcycle. The court allowed the bail petition based on the petitioners' clean criminal antecedent, extended custody period (since 26.02.2026), and the fact that police failed to identify the true owner of the motorcycle, taking a lenient approach. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equivalent amount, with the condition that one surety must be a parent and the other a public servant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case