SHYAM LAL MARANDI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 150/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,118(1),117,109,74,352,351(2),3. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

REGULAR BAIL

CNR: BRJA010014402026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

1330/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

150/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

BICHKORWA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,118(1),117,109,74,352,351(2),3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAM LAL MARANDI

    Adv. Lakhan Lal Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Jamui, granted bail to petitioner Shyam Lal Marandi in a case involving alleged assault and crop destruction. The court found that while there was a disputed occurrence between parties with case and counter-case, most injuries were simple in nature (except one non-vital grievous injury), and the petitioner had a clean record and had already spent over one month in custody. The petitioner was released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Jamui, granted bail to petitioner Shyam Lal Marandi in a case involving alleged assault and crop destruction. The court found that while there was a disputed occurrence between parties with case and counter-case, most injuries were simple in nature (except one non-vital grievous injury), and the petitioner had a clean record and had already spent over one month in custody. The petitioner was released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case