DABLU KUMAR ALIAS VIRENDRA KUMAR AND FIVE OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR — 303/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),117(2),294,331(5),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010014372026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
1327/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
303/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
133
Police Station
MALAYPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DABLU KUMAR ALIAS VIRENDRA KUMAR AND FIVE OTHERS
Adv. PRAFUL KUMAR RAJU
BAM BAHADUR YADAV ALIAS BAHADUR YADAV
Adv. PRAFUL KUMAR RAJU
NIRAJ KUMAR
Adv. PRAFUL KUMAR RAJU
SURAJ KUMAR
Adv. PRAFUL KUMAR RAJU
SINTU KUMAR ALIAS DHIRENDRA KUMAR
Adv. PRAFUL KUMAR RAJU
PHAUDI YADAV
Adv. PRAFUL KUMAR RAJU
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | HEARING. | |
| 19-03-2026 | HEARING. | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING. | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to all six petitioners (Dablu Kumar and five others) in a case involving charges of assault and property dispute. The court applied the principle from Satendar Antil v. CBI, reasoning that since the investigating agency did not arrest the accused during investigation and submitted a chargesheet, no purpose would be served by jailing them, particularly given their clean criminal record and the investigation's completion. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to all six petitioners (Dablu Kumar and five others) in a case involving charges of assault and property dispute. The court applied the principle from Satendar Antil v. CBI, reasoning that since the investigating agency did not arrest the accused during investigation and submitted a chargesheet, no purpose would be served by jailing them, particularly given their clean criminal record and the investigation's completion. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts