VIKRAM TANTI AND 1 OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 154/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),117(2),118(1),109(1),132,125(a),125(b),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
REGULAR BAIL
CNR: BRJA010014342026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
1324/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
154/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
CHANDRAMANDI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIKRAM TANTI AND 1 OTHER
Adv. RAJENDRA PRASAD VERMA
PANKAJ TANTI
Adv. RAJENDRA PRASAD VERMA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING. | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted bail to petitioners Vikram Tanti and Pankaj Tanti, who were in custody since January 27, 2026 in connection with a case involving stone-pelting during a religious procession. The court found that allegations against the petitioners were general and omnibus with no specific overt acts attributed to them, no criminal antecedents, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail on similar grounds. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted bail to petitioners Vikram Tanti and Pankaj Tanti, who were in custody since January 27, 2026 in connection with a case involving stone-pelting during a religious procession. The court found that allegations against the petitioners were general and omnibus with no specific overt acts attributed to them, no criminal antecedents, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail on similar grounds. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts