VIKRAM TANTI AND 1 OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 154/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),117(2),118(1),109(1),132,125(a),125(b),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
REGULAR BAIL
CNR: BRJA010014342026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
1324/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
154/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
CHANDRAMANDI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKRAM TANTI AND 1 OTHER
Adv. RAJENDRA PRASAD VERMA
-
2.PANKAJ TANTI
Adv. RAJENDRA PRASAD VERMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted bail to petitioners Vikram Tanti and Pankaj Tanti, who were in custody since January 27, 2026 in connection with a case involving stone-pelting during a religious procession. The court found that allegations against the petitioners were general and omnibus with no specific overt acts attributed to them, no criminal antecedents, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail on similar grounds. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 154/2026
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted bail to petitioners Vikram Tanti and Pankaj Tanti, who were in custody since January 27, 2026 in connection with a case involving stone-pelting during a religious procession. The court found that allegations against the petitioners were general and omnibus with no specific overt acts attributed to them, no criminal antecedents, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail on similar grounds. The petitioners were directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts