SHEKHAR SAURABH P.S.I. OF JAMUI P.S. vs SONU KUMAR — 3/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8/20 (b), (ii), (C), 25,29. Status: CHARGE.. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

NDPS CASE

CNR: BRJA010013382026

CHARGE.

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

1232/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

8-District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui

FIR Details

FIR Number

484

Police Station

JAMUI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

NDPS Act Section 8/20 (b), (ii), (C), 25,29
Arms Act Section 25(1-B)a, 26,35

Petitioner(s)

SHEKHAR SAURABH P.S.I. OF JAMUI P.S.

Respondent(s)

SONU KUMAR

MD. HUSSAIN

NITESH SINGH

RISHAV SINGH

RAJBALI SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui

19-05-2026

CHARGE.

16-05-2026

CHARGE.

07-05-2026

CHARGE.

23-04-2026

CHARGE.

09-04-2026

CHARGE.

Interim Orders

09-04-2026
Bail Order
09-04-2026
Bail Order

Court Order Summary Bail Application DISMISSED – The Additional Sessions Judge, Jamsui rejected the regular bail applications filed by accused Sonu Kumar and Mo. Hussain in an NDPS case (Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 NDPS Act and Sections 25(1-B)/26(i)/35 Arms Act). The court found sufficient evidence of serious drug trafficking (411.650 kg cannabis seized) and criminal conspiracy, determining that releasing the accused on bail would not be appropriate given the gravity of charges and risk to society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Bail Application DISMISSED – The Additional Sessions Judge, Jamsui rejected the regular bail applications filed by accused Sonu Kumar and Mo. Hussain in an NDPS case (Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 NDPS Act and Sections 25(1-B)/26(i)/35 Arms Act). The court found sufficient evidence of serious drug trafficking (411.650 kg cannabis seized) and criminal conspiracy, determining that releasing the accused on bail would not be appropriate given the gravity of charges and risk to society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case