SUNITA CHAUDHARY ALIAS SUNITA DEVI AND ONE OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 282/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010012772026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1175/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

282/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

142

Police Station

BARHAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

SUNITA CHAUDHARY ALIAS SUNITA DEVI AND ONE OTHER

Adv. ASHISH KUMAR

NIRAJ KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

15-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

HEARING.

16-03-2026

HEARING.

27-02-2026

HEARING.

26-02-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Bail Order

Case Summary: 282/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to Sunita Chaudhary and Niraj Kumar in a kidnapping case after finding that the alleged victim (age 19+) voluntarily left home and boarded a train to Kharagpur on Niraj Kumar's promise to marry her, contradicting the original kidnapping complaint. The court concluded no offense under sections 96 and 3(5) of BNS was made out, characterizing the incident as teenage infatuation rather than criminal conduct, and released both petitioners on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 282/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to Sunita Chaudhary and Niraj Kumar in a kidnapping case after finding that the alleged victim (age 19+) voluntarily left home and boarded a train to Kharagpur on Niraj Kumar's promise to marry her, contradicting the original kidnapping complaint. The court concluded no offense under sections 96 and 3(5) of BNS was made out, characterizing the incident as teenage infatuation rather than criminal conduct, and released both petitioners on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case