AMRESH KUMAR TIWARY vs STATE OF BIHAR — 130/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 98. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
REGULAR BAIL
CNR: BRJA010012552026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
1153/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
130/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
9
Police Station
CHIHARA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMRESH KUMAR TIWARY
Adv. MITHLESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: BA No. 130/2026 The court granted bail to 20-year-old Amresh Kumar Tiwary, who was accused of kidnapping under Section 98 BNS. The court found that while the petitioner was named in the FIR by informant Lalita Devi, she later retracted her version by filing a petition clarifying the petitioner is mentally ill and was falsely implicated due to misconception. The petitioner was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions that one bailor must be a close relative and he must appear before the court on every date, with bail cancellation for non-appearance on two consecutive dates without valid reason. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA No. 130/2026 The court granted bail to 20-year-old Amresh Kumar Tiwary, who was accused of kidnapping under Section 98 BNS. The court found that while the petitioner was named in the FIR by informant Lalita Devi, she later retracted her version by filing a petition clarifying the petitioner is mentally ill and was falsely implicated due to misconception. The petitioner was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions that one bailor must be a close relative and he must appear before the court on every date, with bail cancellation for non-appearance on two consecutive dates without valid reason. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts