AMRESH KUMAR TIWARY vs STATE OF BIHAR — 130/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 98. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

REGULAR BAIL

CNR: BRJA010012552026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

1153/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

130/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

CHIHARA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 98

Petitioner(s)

AMRESH KUMAR TIWARY

Adv. MITHLESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

30-03-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

HEARING.

23-03-2026

HEARING.

16-03-2026

HEARING.

10-03-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Bail Order

Case Summary: BA No. 130/2026 The court granted bail to 20-year-old Amresh Kumar Tiwary, who was accused of kidnapping under Section 98 BNS. The court found that while the petitioner was named in the FIR by informant Lalita Devi, she later retracted her version by filing a petition clarifying the petitioner is mentally ill and was falsely implicated due to misconception. The petitioner was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions that one bailor must be a close relative and he must appear before the court on every date, with bail cancellation for non-appearance on two consecutive dates without valid reason. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA No. 130/2026 The court granted bail to 20-year-old Amresh Kumar Tiwary, who was accused of kidnapping under Section 98 BNS. The court found that while the petitioner was named in the FIR by informant Lalita Devi, she later retracted her version by filing a petition clarifying the petitioner is mentally ill and was falsely implicated due to misconception. The petitioner was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions that one bailor must be a close relative and he must appear before the court on every date, with bail cancellation for non-appearance on two consecutive dates without valid reason. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case