DINBANDHU YADAV vs STATE OF BIHAR — 269/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,307,379,504. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th May 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010011742026
Filing Number
1079/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
269/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
8-District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
Decision Date
18th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
JHAJHA
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DINBANDHU YADAV
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | HEARING. |
| 02-05-2026 | HEARING. |
| 22-04-2026 | HEARING. |
| 10-04-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Dinbandhu Yadav vs State of Bihar (269/2026) The court rejected the bail application of Dinbandhu Yadav, who was accused of attacking a woman named Suchiika with a stick on her head, causing serious injury, on 31.03.2015. The prosecution presented consistent witness testimony corroborating the FIR charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, and 504. The court found that given the nature and circumstances of the case—involving alleged grievous hurt and serious injury—granting bail was inappropriate, and consequently dismissed the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Dinbandhu Yadav vs State of Bihar (269/2026) The court rejected the bail application of Dinbandhu Yadav, who was accused of attacking a woman named Suchiika with a stick on her head, causing serious injury, on 31.03.2015. The prosecution presented consistent witness testimony corroborating the FIR charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, and 504. The court found that given the nature and circumstances of the case—involving alleged grievous hurt and serious injury—granting bail was inappropriate, and consequently dismissed the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts