PUSPA DEVI AND ONE OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 265/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,351(2),109,74,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010011542026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

1060/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

265/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

SONO

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,351(2),109,74,303(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

PUSPA DEVI AND ONE OTHER

Adv. Sudhir Kumar Singh

BANGALI MANDAL

Adv. Sudhir Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui

01-04-2026

Disposed

28-03-2026

HEARING.

17-03-2026

HEARING.

16-03-2026

HEARING.

06-03-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Bail Order

Case Summary: 265/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Puspa Devi and Bangali Mandal in a case registered under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 74, 303(2), and 3(5). The court found that while the prosecution alleged the petitioners assaulted the informant's daughter-in-law Lalita Devi with intent to kill, the medical evidence showed only simple injuries and normal CT scans. The court noted the allegations were "general and omnibus" with no specific allegation of weapon use. The petitioners were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 265/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Puspa Devi and Bangali Mandal in a case registered under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 74, 303(2), and 3(5). The court found that while the prosecution alleged the petitioners assaulted the informant's daughter-in-law Lalita Devi with intent to kill, the medical evidence showed only simple injuries and normal CT scans. The court noted the allegations were "general and omnibus" with no specific allegation of weapon use. The petitioners were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case