TUKAN YADAV AND THREE OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR — 250/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,307,504,380,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010011052026

Filing Number

1014/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

219

Police Station

JHAJHA

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,307,504,380,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TUKAN YADAV AND THREE OTHERS

    Adv. JAWAHAR LAL TANTI

  2. 2.SUBHASH YADAV

  3. 3.VIKASH YADAV

  4. 4.JEERA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case 250/2026 Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Tukan Yadav and three others (accused of theft of irrigation pipe and assault in July 2013). The Principal District & Sessions Judge held that since the alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 307, 504, and 380 are non-compoundable and the court had previously rejected their bail pleas three times, the petition was not maintainable and therefore dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 250/2026 Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Tukan Yadav and three others (accused of theft of irrigation pipe and assault in July 2013). The Principal District & Sessions Judge held that since the alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 307, 504, and 380 are non-compoundable and the court had previously rejected their bail pleas three times, the petition was not maintainable and therefore dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case