CHHOTELAL MARANDI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 96/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115,117(1),118(1),109,74,352,351(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
REGULAR BAIL
CNR: BRJA010009442026
Filing Number
866/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
96/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
79
Police Station
BICHKORWA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHHOTELAL MARANDI
Adv. RUPESH KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted bail to Chhotelal Marandi in a land dispute case involving assault charges. The court found no direct allegation against the petitioner despite serious charges, noted the existence of a counter-case, and considered that injuries were simple in nature and the petitioner had no criminal history. Marandi was ordered released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2026
The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui granted bail to Chhotelal Marandi in a land dispute case involving assault charges. The court found no direct allegation against the petitioner despite serious charges, noted the existence of a counter-case, and considered that injuries were simple in nature and the petitioner had no criminal history. Marandi was ordered released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts