VISHWANATH TANTI AND SEVEN OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR — 207/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),117(2),303(2),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010009052026
Filing Number
831/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
207/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
8-District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
136
Police Station
LACHHUAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHWANATH TANTI AND SEVEN OTHERS
Adv. MUKESH KUMAR
-
2.SAHEB TANTI ALIAS GORELAL TANTI
-
3.RAJO TANTI
-
4.ANUP KUMAR
-
5.NITISH KUMAR
-
6.MANOJ TANTI
-
7.NAGINA DEVI
-
8.KANTI DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to eight accused persons in a case registered under IPC sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5) arising from a violent altercation on 29.10.2025 in Jamui district. The court found that the evidence presented does not clearly establish specific charges against the accused and that both sides filed counter-cases relating to the same incident, noting that no witness testimony had yet conclusively identified who injured whom or where injuries were inflicted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 207/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to eight accused persons in a case registered under IPC sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5) arising from a violent altercation on 29.10.2025 in Jamui district. The court found that the evidence presented does not clearly establish specific charges against the accused and that both sides filed counter-cases relating to the same incident, noting that no witness testimony had yet conclusively identified who injured whom or where injuries were inflicted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts