JITENDRA KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 205/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),308(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010009032026

Case disposed

Filing Number

829/2026

Filing Date

07-02-2026

Registration No

205/2026

Registration Date

07-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

242

Police Station

LAKSHMIPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),308(2),352,351(2),3(5)
SC/ST Act Section 3(i)(r),3(i)(s)

Petitioner(s)

JITENDRA KUMAR

Adv. SOURAV KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

12-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

HEARING.

25-02-2026

HEARING.

21-02-2026

HEARING.

11-02-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Bail Order

The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui rejected the interim bail application of Jitendra Kumar under Section 482 CrPC, holding that under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, Section 18, advance bail is not legally permissible for serious offenses under this Act. The accused was charged with criminal offenses and atrocity-related crimes, and the court found the prosecution's evidence credible regarding the alleged misappropriation of ₹4 lakhs for a tractor sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui rejected the interim bail application of Jitendra Kumar under Section 482 CrPC, holding that under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, Section 18, advance bail is not legally permissible for serious offenses under this Act. The accused was charged with criminal offenses and atrocity-related crimes, and the court found the prosecution's evidence credible regarding the alleged misappropriation of ₹4 lakhs for a tractor sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case