JAI NANDAN PASWAN vs STATE OF BIHAR — 177/2026

Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010008162026

Filing Number

749/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

177/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

8-District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

CHAKAI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAI NANDAN PASWAN

    Adv. NAKUL THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Jayanandan Paswan, accused of illegal electricity theft and unauthorized power connection under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, on the condition that he pay 50% of the assessed loss (₹68,451) within 30 days and deposit the remaining amount in three equal installments, along with furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties and complying with other court-specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing.

    District And Additional Sessions Judge III, Jamui

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Jayanandan Paswan, accused of illegal electricity theft and unauthorized power connection under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, on the condition that he pay 50% of the assessed loss (₹68,451) within 30 days and deposit the remaining amount in three equal installments, along with furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties and complying with other court-specified conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case