BINDU DEVI vs ASHA DEVI AND 3 OTHERS — 13/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),318(4),336(3),64,109,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 25th May 2026.
COMPLAINT CASE (DJ DIV)
CNR: BRJA010008122026
Filing Number
746/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
Decision Date
25th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BINDU DEVI
Adv. CHANDAN KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
ASHA DEVI AND 3 OTHERS
MAHESH SAW
RAHUL KUMAR
SUMAN KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
Disposed
Soleman Affirmation (S.A)
Soleman Affirmation (S.A)
Soleman Affirmation (S.A)
Soleman Affirmation (S.A)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | Soleman Affirmation (S.A) |
| 24-04-2026 | Soleman Affirmation (S.A) |
| 06-04-2026 | Soleman Affirmation (S.A) |
| 16-03-2026 | Soleman Affirmation (S.A) |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge in Jamui rejected Bindu Devi's criminal petition against Asha Devi and others, finding insufficient credible evidence to support her allegations of abuse, assault, and forced consumption of cow dung. The court determined that while the petitioner and her witnesses provided statements regarding the accused's actions, there were material contradictions between the petition, sworn statement, and witness testimonies that undermined their reliability, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case against the accused for any criminal offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge in Jamui rejected Bindu Devi's criminal petition against Asha Devi and others, finding insufficient credible evidence to support her allegations of abuse, assault, and forced consumption of cow dung. The court determined that while the petitioner and her witnesses provided statements regarding the accused's actions, there were material contradictions between the petition, sworn statement, and witness testimonies that undermined their reliability, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case against the accused for any criminal offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts