BANGALI VERMA AND THREE OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR — 167/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),356(2),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010007252026

Case disposed

Filing Number

665/2026

Filing Date

31-01-2026

Registration No

167/2026

Registration Date

31-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

259

Police Station

CHANDRAMANDI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),356(2),351(2),352,3(5)
Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act Section 3/4
SC/ST Act Section 3(i) (r) (s),3(2) (va)

Petitioner(s)

BANGALI VERMA AND THREE OTHERS

DWARIKA VERMA ALIAS DWARIKA MAHTO

RAJENDRA VERMA ALIAS RAJENDRA MAHTO

MANOJ VERMA ALIAS MANOJ MAHTO

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui

18-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

HEARING.

07-03-2026

HEARING.

24-02-2026

HEARING.

16-02-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Bail Order

Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui rejected the bail application of four accused persons (Bangali Verma and others) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 356(2), 351(2), 352, and the SC/ST (Atrocities Prevention) Act, 1989. The court found the charges serious and held that under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, premature bail is not permissible for such offenses. Witness statements corroborated the prosecution's case regarding the assault and threat made by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamui rejected the bail application of four accused persons (Bangali Verma and others) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 356(2), 351(2), 352, and the SC/ST (Atrocities Prevention) Act, 1989. The court found the charges serious and held that under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, premature bail is not permissible for such offenses. Witness statements corroborated the prosecution's case regarding the assault and threat made by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case