VIDYA BHUSHAN SINGH vs STATE OF BIHAR — 73/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
REGULAR BAIL
CNR: BRJA010006572026
Filing Number
603/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
73/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
CHANDRADEEP
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIDYA BHUSHAN SINGH
Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The court granted bail to Vidya Bhushan Singh in a dowry death case, finding that he produced documentary evidence (Steel Authority of India Limited certificate and attendance records) establishing his alibi that he was in Ranchi on the date of the alleged occurrence. The court noted that similar co-accused persons had already been granted anticipatory bail and the petitioner had been in judicial custody for over two months with a clean record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing.
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing.
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing.
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing.
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing.
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
-
31-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 73/2026
The court granted bail to Vidya Bhushan Singh in a dowry death case, finding that he produced documentary evidence (Steel Authority of India Limited certificate and attendance records) establishing his alibi that he was in Ranchi on the date of the alleged occurrence. The court noted that similar co-accused persons had already been granted anticipatory bail and the petitioner had been in judicial custody for over two months with a clean record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts