MANISH BHARTI AND ONE OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR — 133/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,324(4),329(4),303,305,126(2),115(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010005402026
Filing Number
490/2026
Filing Date
24-01-2026
Registration No
133/2026
Registration Date
24-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
69
Police Station
BARHAT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANISH BHARTI AND ONE OTHER
Adv. BHAGWAN DAS
PRINCE BHARTI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District And Additional Sessions Judge I, Jamui
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING. |
| 16-02-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Manish Bharti and Prince Bharti in FIR No. 69/2025. The applicants were accused of being part of a mob of 40-50 individuals who allegedly looted a house, damaged property, stole jewelry worth 15 lakhs and 3 lakhs in cash, and made threats including sexual assault, in connection with a murder case. The court found the applicants had a criminal history and witness statements corroborated the complainant's account of the incident, rendering advance bail inappropriate given the severity of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Manish Bharti and Prince Bharti in FIR No. 69/2025. The applicants were accused of being part of a mob of 40-50 individuals who allegedly looted a house, damaged property, stole jewelry worth 15 lakhs and 3 lakhs in cash, and made threats including sexual assault, in connection with a murder case. The court found the applicants had a criminal history and witness statements corroborated the complainant's account of the incident, rendering advance bail inappropriate given the severity of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts