KONGRESS YADAV AND FIVE OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR — 81/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,427,379,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 24th March 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010002952026
Filing Number
267/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
81/2026
Registration Date
15-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
139
Police Station
CHANDRAMANDI
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KONGRESS YADAV AND FIVE OTHERS
Adv. AMIT PRASAD PASWAN
RANJIT YADAV @ SHOBHAN YADAV
TETU YADAV
GULIYA DEVI
KINY YADAV @ KINU MAHTO
RAUSHAN YADAV
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Kongress Yadav & 5 Others vs. State of Bihar (ABA No. 81/2026) The court rejected anticipatory bail for five petitioners (Kongress Yadav, Ranjit Yadav, Tetu Yadav, Kinu Yadav, and Rashun Yadav) accused of serious crimes including assault with weapons and theft, finding no substantial change in circumstances since their earlier rejected bail application and noting the gravity of allegations involving attacks on vital body parts. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Guliya Devi (a woman with clean antecedent against whom no specific overt act was alleged) on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, valid for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Kongress Yadav & 5 Others vs. State of Bihar (ABA No. 81/2026) The court rejected anticipatory bail for five petitioners (Kongress Yadav, Ranjit Yadav, Tetu Yadav, Kinu Yadav, and Rashun Yadav) accused of serious crimes including assault with weapons and theft, finding no substantial change in circumstances since their earlier rejected bail application and noting the gravity of allegations involving attacks on vital body parts. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Guliya Devi (a woman with clean antecedent against whom no specific overt act was alleged) on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, valid for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts