RAKESH KUMAR ALIAS RAKESH RAWAT vs STATE OF BIHAR — 31/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,109,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th June 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010001042026
Filing Number
92/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Decision Date
11th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
814
Police Station
JAMUI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAKESH KUMAR ALIAS RAKESH RAWAT
Adv. JANARDAN PRASAD MANDAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District And Additional Sessions Judge II, Jamui
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-05-2026 | HEARING. |
| 21-05-2026 | HEARING. |
| 12-05-2026 | HEARING. |
| 02-05-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Rakesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (31/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui rejected Rakesh Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod on December 12, 2024. The court found direct allegations against Rakesh Kumar as the primary assailant who attacked the informant's head causing bleeding, distinguishing his case from co-accused Subodh Rawat who had received bail. The court rejected the bail plea, citing the serious nature of injury to a vital body part indicating criminal intent and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Rakesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (31/2026) The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui rejected Rakesh Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod on December 12, 2024. The court found direct allegations against Rakesh Kumar as the primary assailant who attacked the informant's head causing bleeding, distinguishing his case from co-accused Subodh Rawat who had received bail. The court rejected the bail plea, citing the serious nature of injury to a vital body part indicating criminal intent and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts