State of Bihar- SHAYAM KUMAR vs MANTU KUMAR RAI — 54/2024
Case under Bihar Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Rules,1985 Section 8, 20(b)(ii)(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026 Date Not Updated.
NDPS. S. CASE
CNR: BRGO010206262024
Filing Number
20573/2024
Filing Date
06-Dec-2024
Registration No
54/2024
Registration Date
06-Dec-2024
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
3-ADJ-I
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
117
Police Station
HATHUA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Bihar- SHAYAM KUMAR
Adv. LALLAN DWIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANTU KUMAR RAI
Case History
-
22-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
ADJ-I
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
ADJ-I
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
ADJ-I
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
ADJ-I
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
ADJ-I
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
ADJ-I
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
ADJ-I
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
ADJ-I
-
13-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The discharge petition filed by Mantu Kumar Rai under the NDPS Act (for alleged possession of 10.687 Kg of Ganja) has been rejected. The court found the petition lacks merit as the case diary supports the charge against the accused, and substantial evidence exists for prosecution, despite the petitioner's arguments regarding search and seizure procedures. Further investigation is pending FSL report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Aug-2025
Charge
ADJ-I
-
07-Aug-2025
Charge
ADJ-I
-
29-Jul-2025
Charge
ADJ-I
-
09-Jul-2025
Charge
ADJ-I
-
24-Jun-2025
Charge
ADJ-I
-
03-Jun-2025
Police Paper
ADJ-I
-
13-May-2025
Police Paper
ADJ-I
-
17-Apr-2025
Police Paper
ADJ-I
-
12-Mar-2025
Police Paper
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
Police Paper
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Police Paper
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 54/2024
Summary: The discharge petition filed by Mantu Kumar Rai under the NDPS Act (for alleged possession of 10.687 Kg of Ganja) has been rejected. The court found the petition lacks merit as the case diary supports the charge against the accused, and substantial evidence exists for prosecution, despite the petitioner's arguments regarding search and seizure procedures. Further investigation is pending FSL report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts