BRIJKISHOR PRASAD vs State of Bihar — 2706/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406/34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION on 22nd April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010141462025
Filing Number
13273/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
2706/2025
Registration Date
26-Nov-2025
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJKISHOR PRASAD
Adv. HARISHCHANDRA MISHRA
-
2.SUMAN DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj dismissed an anticipatory bail petition filed by Aarati Kumari in connection with charges under IPC sections 498-A, 406/34, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petition was dismissed due to non-prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear for repeated court hearings despite the matter being pending since 27-11-2025, demonstrating loss of interest in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jan-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2706/2025
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj dismissed an anticipatory bail petition filed by Aarati Kumari in connection with charges under IPC sections 498-A, 406/34, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petition was dismissed due to non-prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear for repeated court hearings despite the matter being pending since 27-11-2025, demonstrating loss of interest in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts