SITU KUMAR GIRI vs State of Bihar — 2522/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331,2,305,a,3/5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010124632025

Filing Number

11648/2025

Filing Date

04-Nov-2025

Registration No

2522/2025

Registration Date

04-Nov-2025

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

3-ADJ-I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

476

Police Station

MIRGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331,2,305,a,3/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SITU KUMAR GIRI

    Adv. LALAN KUMAR BHASKER

  2. 2.BIKASH GIRI

  3. 3.GOLU GIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners accused of robbery, finding that the investigating officer's negligence in not submitting the case diary for over 5 months constituted a serious delay and disobedience of court orders. The court imposed bail conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, cooperation in trial proceedings, and an undertaking from two petitioners with criminal history that repetition of similar offenses would result in automatic bail cancellation, while directing a departmental inquiry against the negligent investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-I

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  7. 23-Dec-2025

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  8. 03-Dec-2025

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2522/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners accused of robbery, finding that the investigating officer's negligence in not submitting the case diary for over 5 months constituted a serious delay and disobedience of court orders. The court imposed bail conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, cooperation in trial proceedings, and an undertaking from two petitioners with criminal history that repetition of similar offenses would result in automatic bail cancellation, while directing a departmental inquiry against the negligent investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case