HAJI NUR ALAM KHAN vs State of Bihar — 1126/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 163. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRGO010100502025

Filing Number

9380/2025

Filing Date

03-Sep-2025

Registration No

1126/2025

Registration Date

03-Sep-2025

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 163

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAJI NUR ALAM KHAN

    Adv. YUDHISTHER MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Hajinur Alam Khan as infructuous. The court held that the original show-cause order issued under Section 163 B.N.S.S. in a land dispute case had already expired, as the statutory maximum period of two months from the order's date (06.08.2025) had lapsed, rendering the order without effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 04-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1126/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Hajinur Alam Khan as infructuous. The court held that the original show-cause order issued under Section 163 B.N.S.S. in a land dispute case had already expired, as the statutory maximum period of two months from the order's date (06.08.2025) had lapsed, rendering the order without effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case