SABIR DEWAN ALIS SABIR ALI vs State of Bihar — 720/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317,5111. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010044542026

Filing Number

4234/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

720/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

24-ADJ-IX

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

83

Police Station

GOPALPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317,5111
Cruelty to Animals Act (Bengal) Section 11(D)(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABIR DEWAN ALIS SABIR ALI

    Adv. DILIP KR. PRASAD

  2. 2.BHUTU DEWAN ALIS BHUTU AI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 720/2026 The court disposed of the anticipatory bail application filed by Sabir Dewan and Bhutu Dewan, who were accused of cattle smuggling under Sections 317(5) and 111 BNS and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act. Finding no recovery from the petitioners' possession, no evidence of conspiracy, and no criminal history, the court directed them to appear before the trial court within four weeks to seek regular bail, which the trial court must consider without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-IX

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-IX

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 720/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 720/2026 The court disposed of the anticipatory bail application filed by Sabir Dewan and Bhutu Dewan, who were accused of cattle smuggling under Sections 317(5) and 111 BNS and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act. Finding no recovery from the petitioners' possession, no evidence of conspiracy, and no criminal history, the court directed them to appear before the trial court within four weeks to seek regular bail, which the trial court must consider without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case