ABHAY KUMAR PANDEY vs State of Bihar — 357/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 163. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd May 2026.

Case disposed

Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRGO010044472026

Filing Number

4227/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

357/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 163

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHAY KUMAR PANDEY

    Adv. MANISH KR. MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-May-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Cri. Rev. No. 357/2026 Case: Abhay Kumar Pandey v. State of Bihar Decision: The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Abhay Kumar Pandey. The court held that the lower court's order dated 29.05.2025 rejecting the petitioner's application was legally valid and did not warrant interference. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish any grounds under Section 163 of the BNSS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) to challenge the order and that the lower court properly exercised its discretion in denying the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 357/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri. Rev. No. 357/2026 Case: Abhay Kumar Pandey v. State of Bihar Decision: The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Abhay Kumar Pandey. The court held that the lower court's order dated 29.05.2025 rejecting the petitioner's application was legally valid and did not warrant interference. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish any grounds under Section 163 of the BNSS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) to challenge the order and that the lower court properly exercised its discretion in denying the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case