BUDHIYA DEVI vs State of Bihar — 262/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,61,2,3/5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010044462026

Filing Number

4226/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

262/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

540

Police Station

MIRGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,61,2,3/5
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BUDHIYA DEVI

    Adv. RAJKISHOR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Budhiya Devi v. State of Bihar (262/2026) Decision: The court rejected Budhiya Devi's bail petition. The Principal Sessions Judge found sufficient evidence linking her to a conspiracy in a shooting death arising from a land dispute, including witness statements, accused confessions, mobile CDR records, and recovered weapons. Reasoning: Despite petitioner's arguments of false implication and absence from the crime scene, the court found the prosecution case serious, with investigation revealing her complicity through multiple corroborating pieces of evidence and ongoing investigation still underway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 262/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Budhiya Devi v. State of Bihar (262/2026) Decision: The court rejected Budhiya Devi's bail petition. The Principal Sessions Judge found sufficient evidence linking her to a conspiracy in a shooting death arising from a land dispute, including witness statements, accused confessions, mobile CDR records, and recovered weapons. Reasoning: Despite petitioner's arguments of false implication and absence from the crime scene, the court found the prosecution case serious, with investigation revealing her complicity through multiple corroborating pieces of evidence and ongoing investigation still underway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case